Jump to content

Provably Fair Mechanics Explained

From Crypto Gambling Wiki
Revision as of 22:39, 14 February 2025 by Loquc (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= Provably Fair Mechanics Explained = '''Provably fair gaming''' is a cryptographic approach that allows players to verify that casino outcomes are genuinely random and not manipulated. Cryptocurrency casinos pioneered this technique to build trust, using cryptographic hash functions and commitment schemes to ensure neither the house nor the player can fully predetermine a game’s result. Below, we delve into the technical foundations of provably fair systems, their im...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Provably Fair Mechanics Explained

Provably fair gaming is a cryptographic approach that allows players to verify that casino outcomes are genuinely random and not manipulated. Cryptocurrency casinos pioneered this technique to build trust, using cryptographic hash functions and commitment schemes to ensure neither the house nor the player can fully predetermine a game’s result. Below, we delve into the technical foundations of provably fair systems, their implementation in leading crypto casinos, security considerations (including potential attack vectors), and real-world case studies illustrating the evolution of these mechanisms.

Cryptographic Foundations

Provably fair systems rely on strong cryptographic primitives to guarantee fairness and transparency. At their core are one-way hash functions and related techniques that allow the casino to commit to outcomes in advance without revealing them, and later provide proof that the outcomes were not altered. Key concepts include hash functions, seed values (server seed and client seed) with a nonce, and commitment schemes (often using HMAC or similar constructs). We outline these foundations below:

Hash Functions and HMAC in Fairness

Cryptographic hash functions (like SHA-256 or SHA-512) take an input and produce a fixed-size output (a digest) that appears random. A crucial property is that they are one-way: given a hash, it’s infeasible to retrieve the original input. Provably fair algorithms leverage this by having the casino generate a secret random value and publish its hash before gameplay.[1] Because the hash is provided in advance, the casino cannot change the secret later without detection, and because the hash is one-way, the player cannot deduce the secret from it. This serves as a commitment to future outcomes.

In practice, many casinos use HMAC (Hash-based Message Authentication Code) constructions. HMAC combines a key (in this context, the secret server seed) with a message (often the client seed and other data) and hashes them. The result is a pseudo-random output that depends on both the secret key and the message. Using HMAC (e.g. HMAC-SHA256 or HMAC-SHA512) ensures that the random result is a function of both the house’s secret and a player-provided value. For example, Primedice (a popular crypto dice game) computes each roll result by applying HMAC-SHA512 with the server’s secret seed as the key and a combination of the client seed and an incrementing nonce as the message.[2] This yields a cryptographic output that cannot be predicted or altered by either party alone.

Why HMAC? In a basic hash commit scheme, one might hash serverSeed + clientSeed to get a random outcome. However, using a keyed hash (HMAC) where the server seed is the key adds an extra layer of security – it ensures the combination isn’t commutative and prevents any party from easily finding inputs to bias the outcome. With a secure HMAC, even if a player tries to choose a special client seed, they cannot influence the result without knowing the server key, and multiple HMAC outputs cannot be used to solve for the secret key due to the strength of the underlying hash function. The deterministic yet unpredictable nature of cryptographic hashing is what makes the outcome verifiable: once the secret is revealed, anyone can recompute the HMAC and confirm the outcome was fair.

Server Seed, Client Seed, and Nonce

Seeds are initial random values that feed into the random outcome generation. In provably fair systems there are typically two independent seeds:

  • Server Seed (House Seed): A large random value generated by the casino. This is kept secret during play but its hash (commitment) is shown to the player beforehand. For example, a server seed might be a 64-character hex string. Its SHA-256 hash is given to the player as an identifier. Because the player has this hash in advance, the casino cannot swap out the server seed later (the hash would no longer match).[3] This server seed often remains fixed for a session or a certain number of games, after which the casino reveals it and generates a new one (a process sometimes called a seeding event).
  • Client Seed (Player Seed): A value provided by the client (usually the player’s browser). Often a default client seed is randomly chosen by the client-side application, and the player is allowed (and encouraged) to change it to one of their choosing for extra assurance.[4] The important aspect is that the client seed is ideally unknown to the casino until bets are placed, so it contributes an element the casino couldn’t have pre-computed outcomes for. In practice, once the player sets a client seed, the casino will know it (since it’s submitted with bets), but the client seed prevents the casino from having pre-calculated a full sequence of outcomes from the start – especially if the player uses a custom, unpredictable seed.

Nonce: To produce a fresh random result for each game round or bet, an extra number called a nonce is used. A nonce is typically an integer counter that increments with each bet (starting from 0 or 1 depending on the implementation).[5] On each bet, the algorithm combines the server seed, client seed, and the current nonce to derive the outcome. The nonce ensures that even with the same pair of seeds, you get a different result every time. In formula form, a common approach is: 

result = HMAC(serverSeed, clientSeed + "-" + nonce).

For instance, if client seed = ClientSeed123 and nonce = 0, the casino computes HMAC(serverSeed, "ClientSeed123-0"). For the next bet nonce=1, HMAC(serverSeed, "ClientSeed123-1"), and so on.[6] This way a single seed pair yields a provably random sequence of outcomes. The use of a nonce prevents having to generate a new seed for every bet and still maintains uniqueness of each result.

Commitment Scheme: The combination of these elements forms a commitment scheme. The casino commits to a server seed by publishing its hash, the player possibly commits to a client seed by choosing one, and each bet uses the nonce to produce a result. After the betting session, the casino reveals the actual server seed. The player can then verify each outcome by recomputing the HMAC/hash sequence for each nonce and checking that it matches the results that were delivered. If even one outcome was manipulated, the hash of the server seed the casino provided earlier would not match the revealed server seed, exposing cheating.[7][8] This commit-and-reveal process is the cryptographic proof of fairness: it’s effectively a digital promise that is later honored and can be independently checked.

Cryptographic Proof Example

To cement these concepts, consider a concrete example from a dice game:

  • The casino picks a server seed S = 293d5d2...c999f04 (shown here in hexadecimal) and reveals its hash H(S) = 5ac59780d5...6505801 to the player before any bets.[9][10]
  • The player (client) chooses a client seed C = "ClientSeedForDiceSites.com".[11]
  • For the first bet, nonce = 0. The casino computes the HMAC-SHA512 with key = S and message = "C-0".[12] In our example, HMAC_SHA512(S, "ClientSeedForDiceSites.com-0") produces a hexadecimal output:
 aa671aad5e4565ebffb8dc5c185e4df1ae6d9aca2578b5c03ec9c7750f881922276d8044e5e3d84f158ce411f667e224e9b0c1ac50fc94e9c5eb883a678f6ca2
 
 (128 hex characters, since SHA-512 outputs 64 bytes).[13]
  • To derive a numeric dice roll, the site uses a specific algorithm on this HMAC output. Typically, it takes the first 5 hex characters and checks if it’s under a certain cutoff to avoid bias. In this example, the first 5 hex chars are aa671 (decimal 697,969).[14] If over 999,999, it discards and takes the next 5. Here it’s accepted, so 697969 mod 10000 = 7969. Dividing by 100 yields 79.69. This becomes the dice outcome (0.00 – 99.99).[15]
  • Later, when the casino reveals the server seed S, the player can perform the same HMAC and calculation to verify it indeed yields 79.69. The hashed commitment ensures the casino could not have changed S without detection, and the use of both S and C in the HMAC means neither party alone controlled the outcome.

This example demonstrates how cryptographic hashing and HMACs provide a verifiable trail from secret seeds to fair random outcomes. The hash of the server seed is the cryptographic proof the casino cannot cheat, and the reveal of S allows verification of every bet in retrospect.

Implementation in Crypto Casinos

While the underlying principles are similar, different crypto casinos implement provably fair mechanics with their own twists and game-specific details. We will examine how these systems are structured in leading crypto casinos like Primedice, Stake, and Bustabit, focusing on the flow from bet placement to outcome validation and the server–client interactions that ensure transparency.

General Workflow of a Provably Fair Bet

Though specifics vary by game, most implementations follow a general workflow:

  1. Server Seed Generation: The casino generates a random server seed (typically a long cryptographic random string). The hash of this server seed is computed and presented to the player. This is the commitment. The server seed itself remains secret for now.
  2. Client Seed Selection: The client’s browser generates a random client seed by default, which the player can optionally change. The chosen client seed is known to the casino once set, but importantly the casino did not know it prior to committing to the server seed hash.
  3. Bet Execution: When the player places a bet, the system uses the current seeds and nonce to generate a result:
    • The nonce (initially 0 or 1) is taken for that bet and often incremented afterward.
    • The server combines the server seed, client seed, and nonce in a predetermined cryptographic function (e.g., an HMAC or a hash). The output is then converted into a game result (dice roll, card shuffle, crash multiplier, etc.).
    • The outcome is returned to the player instantly.
  4. Repeat for Subsequent Bets: The nonce increments for the next bet, yielding a new random output from the same seeds, until a seed rotation is triggered.
  5. Seed Rotation and Verification: When a new server seed is chosen, the casino reveals the old seed. The player can then verify all outcomes that occurred under the old seed by recomputing them. The casino provides the hash of the new server seed as the next commitment.

Many casinos also provide a built-in verification tool or link to third-party verifiers. The algorithms (HMAC, how many hex characters are taken, etc.) are typically openly described in help pages or public code, so that independent audits are possible.

Example: Primedice and Stake – Dice Game Algorithm

Primedice (launched 2013) is one of the earliest Bitcoin dice sites and set the standard for provably fair dice. Its approach (also used by Stake for dice) follows the HMAC method:

  • Seeds: Primedice allows the user to set a client seed and internally generates a server seed. The server seed’s SHA-256 hash is shown to the user.
  • Combining Seeds: Each roll is computed via HMAC-SHA512(server_seed, client_seed - nonce).[16]
  • Deriving a Roll: Primedice interprets the HMAC output as a hex string representing a large number. It checks the first 5 hex chars for a uniform range ≤ 999,999, discards if over that threshold, etc.[17] If acceptable, it converts the 5-char hex to a decimal, takes mod 10,000, and divides by 100 to get a 0–99.99 roll.[18]
  • Verification: After the user finishes or requests new seeds, Primedice reveals the old server seed. The user recalculates any roll to confirm it matches the result shown during play.

Stake, launched by the same founders, uses nearly the same approach for its dice game. Both sites run periodic seed cycles: the user interface shows the current client seed and the hash of the server seed, with an option to reveal and rotate. This ensures that for each bet, the server’s contribution was fixed beforehand, and the user’s client seed adds uncertainty.

Example: Bustabit – Crash Game Mechanism

Bustabit introduced the popular “crash” style game. Crash games differ from dice in that a multiplier increases until it “crashes,” with all players on the same outcome. Bustabit uses a chain of hashes combined with external randomness:

  • Hash Chain Commitment: Bustabit pre-generates a sequence of SHA-256 hashes by hashing repeatedly (e.g., 10 million times). The last hash is published as the commitment (the “terminating hash”). Because each hash is derived from the previous, revealing the final hash commits Bustabit to the entire chain.[19]
  • Incorporating Client Seed / External Salt: Bustabit v2 salted the chain with a future Bitcoin block hash to ensure neither side (house nor players) could predict outcomes.[20]
  • Crash Outcome Calculation: They compute an HMAC of the chain hash and the external salt (or Vx signature), interpret bits from the output, and feed it into a formula that yields the crash multiplier.[21]
  • Verification: After the chain is exhausted or in a new seeding event, Bustabit reveals the secret seeds so anyone can hash them to confirm they match the terminating hash. Each round’s external randomness (Bitcoin block hash, etc.) and the final HMAC is published so players can confirm the crash outcome.

Stake’s Crash game uses a similar principle, publishing a combination of server seed, a player/house seed, and a blockchain hash. These examples illustrate how provably fair mechanics adapt to different game types – from simple dice to multiplayer crash.

Security Considerations & Attack Vectors

A provably fair system is only as strong as its implementation. Cryptography provides the tools, but real-world deployments must be careful to avoid pitfalls. Below, we discuss known vulnerabilities, potential exploits, and best practices.

Seed Security and Predictability

The security of the seeds is paramount. If an attacker obtains the server seed before it’s revealed, they can predict future outcomes:

  • Strength of Server Seeds: Server seeds should be large and random. A weak or predictable seed can be brute-forced by hashing guesses until a match is found.
  • Client Seed Control: If players do not change the default client seed, the casino effectively knows all variables. A rogue casino could theoretically pick a server seed that yields unfavorable outcomes. Players should pick truly random client seeds.[22]
  • Nonce Usage: Nonce predictability is generally not an issue as long as seeds are secret/unpredictable. The key is that the casino must commit to its server seed before knowing the client’s final choice.
  • Static vs Per-Round Client Seeds: Some systems keep the client seed fixed for many bets; others let the user (or an external source) provide fresh entropy each round. Either can be secure if properly implemented.

Implementation Vulnerabilities

Even robust cryptographic algorithms can fail if implemented incorrectly:

  • The Primedice Hack (2014): An attacker called “Hufflepuff” exploited a concurrency bug that revealed an active server seed, netting over $1 million in Bitcoin.[23] The cryptography was not broken; the bug lay in how the site handled seed rotation.
  • Predictable Seeds: Using poor random number generators or simple timestamps for seeds can allow attackers to guess them.
  • Insider Threats: If an insider knows the server seed, they could collude with players.
  • House Edge Misrepresentation: Provably fair ensures randomness, not that the odds favor the player. Some casinos might set payoff odds that guarantee a house edge.
  • Front-running or Selective Canceling: A casino could see the outcome before finalizing the bet and cancel losing bets on their side. Pure cryptography can’t prevent this; reputation and transparency logs are key defenses.
  • External Manipulation: In systems relying on external data (block hashes, oracles), an attacker might attempt to manipulate that data if the stakes are large.
  • Timing Attacks on HMAC: In practice, this is unlikely in a typical web setting; players only receive the final outcome, not direct timing data from the HMAC function.

Randomness and Entropy Sources

Ensuring true randomness is critical:

  • Seeds must come from high-entropy sources (secure RNGs).
  • Nonces are just counters; they don’t need to be random.
  • Frequent reseeding (e.g., after a certain number of bets) is common for security.
  • Many sites use scheduled randomness or multi-party randomness (e.g., combining a server seed with a blockchain hash).
  • A robust implementation ensures that no single entity can compromise the system without detection.

Best Practices for Provably Fair Security

  1. Use proven hash functions (SHA-256/SHA-512) and HMAC; avoid home-grown RNG.
  2. Commit to the server seed before collecting the client seed; encourage custom client seeds.
  3. Securely handle and rotate seeds; never reveal a seed while it’s still active.
  4. Offer public verification tools or open-source code for transparency.
  5. Conduct auditable seeding events, ideally involving external randomness (e.g., Bitcoin block hash).
  6. Stay vigilant for new threats or cryptographic weaknesses.

By following these principles, casinos significantly reduce the risk of cheating or hidden manipulation.

Case Studies & Examples

Primedice: Pioneering Bitcoin Dice (2013)

Primedice was one of the first major Bitcoin gambling sites to fully embrace provably fair gaming. Its transparent model:

  • Provided a verifier and full details so players could audit their bets.[24]
  • Suffered an infamous exploit in 2014, where “Hufflepuff” found a concurrency flaw to reveal an active server seed.[25]
  • Overcame that incident by patching the bug and reinforcing its seed handling logic.

Primedice’s success influenced countless dice sites, many of which adopted nearly identical HMAC-based algorithms.

Stake: Multi-game Platform & Public Seed Events

Stake.com, launched in 2017 by the Primedice team, expanded the model to a full casino suite:

  • Unified Seed System: The same seeds (server and client) drive multiple game types—dice, crash, blackjack, etc.—with unique logic for each.
  • Public Seeding Events: Stake periodically announces a future Bitcoin block that will be used to generate a new server seed, ensuring unpredictability.[26]
  • Game-Specific Tweaks: Each game’s house edge and random outcome derivation (e.g., how the HMAC output is sliced) are publicly documented.
  • Verification Tools: Stake provides an API and resources for auditing large numbers of bets, reinforcing transparency.

Bustabit: Evolution of Crash Fairness (2015–2023)

Bustabit advanced provably fair mechanics for multiplayer “crash” games:

  • Bustabit v1 & v2: Introduced large hash chains pre-committed with a terminating hash, then salted outcomes with Bitcoin block hashes for extra randomness.[27]
  • Current Implementation (v3+): Combines the hash chain with a third-party BLS signature (Vx) and a Bitcoin block hash, distributing trust so neither Bustabit nor any single party can rig outcomes.[28]
  • Open Verification: Bustabit publishes code and partners with external audit services (e.g., “Actually Fair”) to validate results at scale.

References

  1. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=%2A%20Nonce%20,with%20each%20bet%20you%20make
  2. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=PrimeDice%20first%20calculates%20a%20HMAC,with%20these%20variables%2C%20like%20this
  3. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=You%20will%20get%20an%20encrypted,you%20get%20the%20unhashed%20serverseed
  4. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=Your%20browser%20will%20generate%20a,know%20your%20clientseed%20in%20advance
  5. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=Now%20if%20you%20make%20a,will%20go%20up%20by%201
  6. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=PrimeDice%20first%20calculates%20a%20HMAC,with%20these%20variables%2C%20like%20this
  7. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=You%20do%20not%20get%20the,cheated%20would%20include%202%20steps
  8. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=Serverseed%20unhashed%3A%20293d5d2ddd365f54759283a8097ab2640cbe6f8864adc2b1b31e65c14c999f04%20Serverseed%20hashed%3A,5ac59780d512265230d5efb3cc238886dc1b457a80b54fbf1f920b99c6505801
  9. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=Clientseed%3A%20ClientSeedForDiceSites,PrimeDice
  10. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=293d5d2ddd365f54759283a8097ab2640cbe6f8864adc2b1b31e65c14c999f04%20Serverseed%20hashed%3A%205ac59780d512265230d5efb3cc238886dc1b457a80b54fbf1f920b99c6505801%20Nonce%3A,PrimeDice
  11. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=Clientseed%3A%20ClientSeedForDiceSites,PrimeDice
  12. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=PrimeDice%20first%20calculates%20a%20HMAC,with%20these%20variables%2C%20like%20this
  13. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=Calculated%20outcome%3A
  14. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=Now%20the%20first%205%20characters,html
  15. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=If%20this%20number%20is%20over,just%20on%20Google%20by%20typing
  16. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=PrimeDice%20first%20calculates%20a%20HMAC,with%20these%20variables%2C%20like%20this
  17. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=Now%20the%20first%205%20characters,html
  18. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=If%20this%20number%20is%20over,just%20on%20Google%20by%20typing
  19. ↑ Bustabit's new seeding event : r/bustabit, https://www.reddit.com/r/bustabit/comments/1av6hym/bustabits_new_seeding_event/#:~:text=1%2C567a98370fb7545137ddb53687723cf0b8a1f5e93b1f76f4a1da29416930fa59
  20. ↑ Breaking Down Provably Fair Gambling With Data | by Connor Maloney | Good Audience, https://blog.goodaudience.com/breaking-down-provably-fair-gambling-with-data-19ba831edcfb#:~:text=Bustabit%20uses%20a%20secret%20key,the%20finer%20technical%20details%20here
  21. ↑ Bustabit's new seeding event : r/bustabit, https://www.reddit.com/r/bustabit/comments/1av6hym/bustabits_new_seeding_event/#:~:text=export%20function%20gameResult,most%20significant%20bits%20to%20use
  22. ↑ Provably fair = Stake is able to anticipate the client seed - Casino Discussion - Stake Forum, https://stakecommunity.com/topic/47231-provably-fair-stake-is-able-to-anticipate-the-client-seed/#:~:text=I%20think%20his%20point%20,seed%20change%20would%20be%20%27seed4
  23. ↑ Dude Finds Flaw in World's Biggest Gambling Site, Steals $1M in Bitcoin, https://hackread.com/gambling-site-hacked-bitcoin-stolen/#:~:text=match%20at%20L163%20Since%20Primedice,was%20able%20to%20corroborate%20the
  24. ↑ Provably Fair explanation - DiceSites.com, https://dicesites.com/provably-fair#:~:text=The%20easy%20way%20is%20to,Our%20verifiers
  25. ↑ Dude Finds Flaw in World's Biggest Gambling Site, Steals $1M in Bitcoin, https://hackread.com/gambling-site-hacked-bitcoin-stolen/#:~:text=match%20at%20L163%20Since%20Primedice,was%20able%20to%20corroborate%20the
  26. ↑ Understanding Provable Fairness: Seeds, Hashes, HMAC and mathMAX, https://crashgambler.io/understanding-provable-fairness-in-crash-games/#:~:text=What%20is%20a%20public%20seeding,event
  27. ↑ Breaking Down Provably Fair Gambling With Data | by Connor Maloney | Good Audience, https://blog.goodaudience.com/breaking-down-provably-fair-gambling-with-data-19ba831edcfb#:~:text=Bustabit%20uses%20a%20secret%20key,the%20finer%20technical%20details%20here
  28. ↑ Bustabit's new seeding event : r/bustabit, https://www.reddit.com/r/bustabit/comments/1av6hym/bustabits_new_seeding_event/#:~:text=Our%20provably%20fair%20system%2C%20based,on%20behalf%20of%20our%20players
Retrieved from "https://cryptogamblingwiki.org/index.php?title=Provably_Fair_Mechanics_Explained&oldid=23"